Applying the Conceptual Framework – Chartered Accountants in Practice
(a)
Self-interest Threats • A chartered accountant having a direct financial interest in a client. • A chartered accountant quoting a low fee to obtain a new engagement and the fee is so low that it might be difficult to perform the professional service in accordance with applicable technical and professional standards for that price. • A chartered accountant having a close business relationship with a client. • A chartered accountant having access to confidential information that might be used for personal gain. • A chartered accountant discovering a significant error when evaluating the results of a previous professional service performed by a member of the accountant’s firm.
(b)
Self-review Threats • A chartered accountant issuing an assurance report on the effectiveness of the operation of financial systems after implementing the systems. • A chartered accountant having prepared the original data used to generate records that are the subject matter of the assurance engagement.
(c)
Advocacy Threats • A chartered accountant promoting the interests of, or shares in, a client. • A chartered accountant acting as an advocate on behalf of a client in litigation or disputes with third parties. • A chartered accountant lobbying in favor of legislation on behalf of a client.
(d)
Familiarity Threats • A chartered accountant having a close or immediate family member who is a director or officer of the client. • A director or officer of the client, or an employee in a position to exert significant influence over the subject matter of the engagement, having recently served as the engagement partner. • An audit team member having a long association with the audit client.
(e)
Intimidation Threats • A chartered accountant being threatened with dismissal from a client engagement or the firm because of a disagreement about a professional matter. • A chartered accountant feeling pressured to agree with the judgment of a client because the client has more expertise on the matter in question. • A chartered accountant being informed that a planned promotion will not occur unless the accountant agrees with an inappropriate accounting treatment. • A chartered accountant having accepted a significant gift from a client and being threatened that acceptance of this gift will be made public.
(a)
The client and its operating environment; and
(b)
The firm and its operating environment. 300.7 A2 The chartered accountant’s evaluation of the level of a threat is also impacted by the nature and scope of the professional service.
(a)
An audit client and whether the audit client is a public interest entity;
(b)
An assurance client that is not an audit client; or
(c)
A non-assurance client.
(a)
Impact the level of a threat; or
(b)
Affect the chartered accountant’s conclusions about whether safeguards applied continue to address identified threats as intended.
(a)
The nature and importance of the circumstances; and
(b)
The matter to be communicated. 300.9 A2 Examples of a subgroup of those charged with governance include an audit committee or an individual member of those charged with governance.