Section 5411: Compensation and Evaluation Policies

Introduction

5411.1 Firms are required to comply with the fundamental principles, be independent and apply the conceptual framework set out in Section 5120 to identify, evaluate and address threats to independence. 5411.2 A firm’s evaluation or compensation policies might create a self-interest threat. This section sets out specific requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

General

5411.3 A1 When a sustainability assurance team member for a particular sustainability assurance client is evaluated on or compensated for selling non-assurance services to that sustainability assurance client, the level of the self-interest threat will depend on:

(a)

What proportion of the compensation or evaluation is based on the sale of such services;

(b)

The role of the individual on the sustainability assurance team; and

(c)

Whether the sale of such non-assurance services influences promotion decisions. 5411.3 A2 Examples of actions that might eliminate such a self-interest threat include: • Revising the compensation plan or evaluation process for that individual. • Removing that individual from the sustainability assurance team. 5411.3 A3 An example of an action that might be a safeguard to address such a self-interest threat is having an appropriate reviewer review the work of the sustainability assurance team member.

R5411.4

A firm shall not evaluate or compensate a key sustainability

assurance leader based on that leader’s success in selling non-assurance services to the leader’s sustainability assurance client. This requirement does not preclude normal profit-sharing arrangements between leaders of a firm.