Appearance by authorised representative
(1)
An assessee, entitled or required to attend before any income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal for any proceeding under this Act, may attend through an authorised representative.
(2)
The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply where an assessee is required to attend personally for examination on oath or affirmation under section 246section 246.
(3)
In this section,––
(a)
“authorised representative” means a person authorised by the assessee, in writing, to appear on his behalf, being—
(ix)
any other person as prescribed;
(b)
“accountant” means a chartered accountant as defined in section 2section 2(1)(b) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, who holds a valid certificate of practice under section 6section 6(1) of that Act, but does not include [except for representing the assessee under sub-section (1)],—
(B)
for an assessee, being a trust or institution, any person referred to in section 355section 355(h)(i) or (ii) or (iii) or (iv);
(C)
for any person other than the persons referred to in sub-clauses (A) and (B), the person who is competent to verify the return under section 263section 263 as per section 265section 265;
(D)
any relative of any of the persons referred to in sub-clauses (A), (B) and (C);
(E)
an officer or employee of the assessee;
(F)
an individual, who, is a partner, or who is in the employment, of an officer or employee of the assessee;
(G)
an individual, who or his relative or partner—
(II)
is indebted to the assessee, and such debt in case of his relative does not exceed one lakh rupees;
(III)
has given a guarantee or provided security in connection with the indebtedness of a third person to the assessee and such relative gives a guarantee or provides security for an amount not exceeding one lakh rupees;
(H)
a person who, whether directly or indirectly, has business relationship with the assessee of such nature, as prescribed;
(I)
a person convicted by a court of an offence involving fraud and ten years has not elapsed from the date of such conviction.
(4)
No person,—
(ii)
for such time as the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may by order determine, in case of a person referred to in clause (b);
(iii)
for the period during which the insolvency continues, in case of a person referred to in clause (c); and
(5)
If a person,—
(b)
who is not a legal practitioner or an accountant, and is found guilty of misconduct in any income-tax proceedings by the prescribed income-tax authority, may be directed by such authority that he shall henceforth be disqualified from representing an assessee under sub-section (1).
(6)
Every order or direction under sub-section (4)(b) or (5)(b) shall be subject to the following conditions:—
(b)
any person against whom such an order or direction is made may, within one month of the said order or direction, appeal to the Board to have the order or direction cancelled; and
(7)
A person disqualified to represent an assessee by virtue of section 61section 61(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 or section 288section 288(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 shall be disqualified to represent an assessee under sub-section (1).
(8)
In this section, “relative”, in relation to an individual, means—
(b)
brother or sister of the individual;
(c)
brother or sister of the spouse of the individual;
(d)
any lineal ascendant or descendant of the individual;
(e)
any lineal ascendant or descendant of the spouse of the individual;
(f)
spouse of a person referred to in clauses (b), (c), (d) or (e);
(g)
any lineal descendant of a brother or sister of either the individual or the spouse of the individual.