The Examination of Prospective Financial Information
(a)
management’s best-estimate assumptions on which the prospective financial information is based are not unreasonable and, in the case of hypothetical assumptions, such assumptions are consistent with the purpose of the information;
(b)
the prospective financial information is properly prepared on the basis of the assumptions;
(c)
the prospective financial information is properly presented and all material assumptions are adequately disclosed, including a clear indication as to whether they are best-estimate assumptions or hypothetical assumptions; and 1 The guidance provided in this Standard is in line with the provisions of clause (3) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 [as amended by the Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Act, 2006]. This clause provides that a chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct “if he permits his name or the name of his firm to be used in connection with an estimate of earnings contingent upon future transactions in a manner which may lead to the belief that he vouches for the accuracy of the forecast.” As per the opinion of the Council while finalising the Guidance Note on Accountant’s Report on Profit Forecasts and/or Financial Forecasts at its 100th meeting held on 22nd through 24th July 1982, a chartered accountant can participate in the preparation of profit or financial forecasts and can review them, provided he indicates clearly in his report the sources of information, the basis of forecasts and also the major assumptions made in arriving at the forecasts and so long as he does not vouch for the accuracy of the forecasts. The Council has further opined that the same opinion would also apply to projections made on the basis of hypothetical assumptions about future events and management actions which are not necessarily expected to take place so long as the auditor does not vouch for the accuracy of the projection. (emphasis added) 2 The term “auditor” is used throughout this SAE when describing services involving examination of prospective financial information. Such reference is not intended to imply that a member performing such services need necessarily be the statutory auditor of the entity’s financial statements.
(d)
the prospective financial information is prepared on a consistent basis with historical financial statements, using appropriate accounting principles.
(a)
hypothetical assumptions about future events and management actions which are not necessarily expected to take place, such as when some entities are in a start-up phase or are considering a major change in the nature of operations; or
(b)
a mixture of best-estimate and hypothetical assumptions. Such information illustrates the possible consequences as of the date the information is prepared if the events and actions were to occur (a “what-if” scenario).
(a)
as an internal management tool, for example, to assist in evaluating a possible capital investment; or
(b)
for the distribution/submission to third parties in, for example: a prospectus to provide potential investors with information about future expectations. an annual report to provide information to shareholders, regulatory bodies and other interested parties. a document, for example, cash flow forecasts, for the information of lenders.
(a)
The internal controls over the system used to prepare prospective financial information and the expertise and experience of those persons preparing the prospective financial information.
(b)
The nature of the documentation prepared by the entity supporting management’s assumptions.
(c)
The extent to which statistical, mathematical and computer-assisted techniques are used.
(d)
The methods used to develop and apply assumptions.
(e)
The accuracy of prospective financial information prepared in prior periods, if any, and the reasons for any significant variances therein.
(a)
The operating cycle, for example, in the case of a major construction project undertaken by a construction company, the time required to complete the project may dictate the period covered.
(b)
The degree of reliability of assumptions, for example, if the entity is introducing a new product, the prospective period covered could be short and broken into small segments, such as weeks or months. Alternatively, if for example, the entity’s sole business is owning a property under long-term lease, a relatively long prospective period might be reasonable.
(c)
The needs of users, for example, prospective financial information may be prepared in connection with an application for a loan for the period of time required to generate sufficient funds for repayment. Alternatively, the information may be prepared for investors in connection with the issue of securities to illustrate the intended use of the proceeds in the subsequent period.
(a)
the knowledge obtained during any previous engagements;
(b)
management’s competence regarding the preparation of prospective financial information;
(c)
the likelihood of material misstatement;
(d)
the extent to which the prospective financial information is affected by the management’s judgment;
(e)
the sources of information considered by the management for the purpose, their adequacy, reliability of the underlying data, including data derived from third parties, such as industry statistics, to support the assumptions;
(f)
the stability of entity’s business; and
(g)
the engagement team’s experience with the business and the industry in which the entity operates and with reporting on prospective financial information.
(a)
the presentation of prospective financial information is informative and not misleading;
(b)
the accounting policies are clearly disclosed in the notes to the prospective financial information;
(c)
the assumptions are adequately disclosed in the notes to the prospective financial information. It needs to be clear whether assumptions represent management’s best-estimates or are hypothetical and, when assumptions are made in areas that are material and are subject to a high degree of uncertainty, this uncertainty and the resulting sensitivity of results needs to be adequately disclosed;
(d)
the date as of which the prospective financial information was prepared is disclosed. Management needs to confirm that the assumptions are appropriate as of this date, even though the underlying information may have been accumulated over a period of time;
(e)
the basis of establishing points in a range is clearly indicated and the range is not selected in a biased or misleading manner when results shown in the prospective financial information are expressed in terms of a range; and
(f)
there is any change in the accounting policy of the entity from that disclosed in the most recent historical financial statements and whether reason for the change and the effect of such change on the prospective financial information has been adequately disclosed.
(a)
Title;
(b)
Addressee;
(c)
Identification of the prospective financial information;
(d)
Reference to the Standards on Auditing applicable to the examination of prospective financial information;
(e)
Statement that management is responsible for the prospective financial information including the underlying assumptions;
(f)
(g)
Statement that the examination procedures included examination, on a test basis, of evidence supporting the assumptions, amounts and other disclosures in the forecast or projection;
(h)
Statement of negative assurance as to whether the assumptions provide a reasonable basis for the prospective financial information;
(i)
(j)
(k)
Date of report (which should be the date procedures have been completed);
(l)
(m)
Signature.
(ISAE)
3400 “The Examination of Prospective Financial Information”, are consistent in all material respects:
(a)
SAE precludes the auditor from expressing positive assurance regarding the assumptions as it may tantamount to vouching for the accuracy of the forecast/projection/hypothetical assumptions. Whereas, the ISAE 3400 permits the auditor to express positive assurance when in his judgment an appropriate level of satisfaction has been obtained.
(b)
The sub points in paragraph 17 (corresponding to paragraph 17 of the ISAE 3400) have been rearranged. Sub point (e) has been elucidated for the sake of better understanding of the readers. The sub points (f) and (g) have been added in the SAE as additional factors to be considered by the auditor.
(c)
In paragraph 20 of the SAE, the phrase “although evidence supporting hypothetical assumptions need not be obtained” has been deleted since it is felt that such a phrase is inconsistent with the necessity for the auditor to obtain evidence to support his conclusions.
(d)
In paragraph 26 (corresponding to paragraph 26 of the ISAE 3400), the term “professional standards” has been changed to “professional pronouncements” since pronouncements would include standards as well as other relevant documents, such as Guidance Notes, announcement(s), issued by the ICAI.
(e)
In line with requirement of SA 700(Revised), “Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements” this SAE requires the auditor to include a scope section in the examination report to explain the nature and extent of the auditor’s work. ISAE 3400 does not contain an equivalent requirement.
(f)
SAE specifically provides for the documentation required to be done by the auditor in regard to any engagement of examination of prospective financial information. However, ISAE 3400 does not contain such explicit provision.
Notes, amendments & references (2)
8 Partner or proprietor, as the case may be.
11 Partner or proprietor, as the case may be.