Family and Personal Relationships
(a)
Is a director or officer of the audit client;
(b)
Is an employee in a position to exert significant influence over the preparation of the client’s accounting records or the financial statements on which the firm will express an opinion; or
(c)
Was in such position during any period covered by the engagement or the financial statements. Additionally, under Companies Act, 2013, where applicable, as per Sec 141 (3)(f) of the Act an individual practitioner, sole proprietor or the firm is ineligible from being appointed as an auditor of a Company where relative of an individual practitioner, sole proprietor or partner (as the case may be) is a director or is in the employment of the company as a director or key managerial personnel as defined under the Companies Act, 2013.
(a)
A director or officer of the audit client; or
(b)
An employee in a position to exert significant influence over the preparation of the client’s accounting records or the financial statements on which the firm will express an opinion. 521.6 A2 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of such threats include: • The nature of the relationship between the audit team member and the close family member. • The position held by the close family member. • The role of the audit team member. 521.6 A3 An example of an action that might eliminate such a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat is removing the individual from the audit team. 521.6 A4 An example of an action that might be a safeguard to address such a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat is structuring the responsibilities of the audit team so that the audit team member does not deal with matters that are within the responsibility of the close family member. 521.6 A5 Additionally, under Companies Act, 2013, where applicable, as per Sec 141 (3)(f) of the Act an individual practitioner, sole proprietor or the firm is ineligible from being appointed as an auditor of a Company where relative of an individual practitioner, sole proprietor or partner (as the case may be) is a director or is in the employment of the company as a director or key managerial personnel as defined under the Companies Act, 2013.
(a)
A director or officer of the audit client; or
(b)
An employee in a position to exert significant influence over the preparation of the client’s accounting records or the financial statements on which the firm will express an opinion. 521.7 A1 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat created by such a relationship include: • The nature of the relationship between the individual and the audit team member. • The position the individual holds with the client. • The role of the audit team member. 521.7 A2 An example of an action that might eliminate such a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat is removing the individual from the audit team. 521.7 A3 An example of an action that might be a safeguard to address such a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat is structuring the responsibilities of the audit team so that the audit team member does not deal with matters that are within the responsibility of the individual with whom the audit team member has a close relationship. 521.7 A4 Additionally, under Companies Act, 2013, where applicable, as per Sec 141 (3)(f) of the Act an individual practitioner, sole proprietor or the firm is ineligible from being appointed as an auditor of a Company where relative of an individual practitioner, sole proprietor or partner (as the case may be) is a director or is in the employment of the company as a director or key managerial personnel as defined under the Companies Act, 2013 Relationships of Partners and Employees of the Firm R521.8 Partners and employees of the firm shall consult in accordance with firm policies and procedures if they are aware of a personal or family relationship between:
(a)
A partner or employee of the firm or network firm who is not an audit team member; and
(b)
A director or officer of the audit client or an employee of the audit client in a position to exert significant influence over the preparation of the client’s accounting records or the financial statements on which the firm will express an opinion. 521.8 A1 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat created by such a relationship include: • The nature of the relationship between the partner or employee of the firm and the director or officer or employee of the client. • The degree of interaction of the partner or employee of the firm with the audit team. • The position of the partner or employee within the firm. • The position the individual holds with the client. 521.8 A2 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threats include: • Structuring the partner’s or employee’s responsibilities to reduce any potential influence over the audit engagement. • Having an appropriate reviewer review the relevant audit work performed.