Pillar · Product

How to use Complied AI for compliance research: updates to act to ask

An end-to-end workflow for compliance research on Complied AI: start from the updates feed, open the official document behind a change, jump to the Act or regulation section it touches, and ask a section-grounded question. Three worked scenarios across an MCA form change, a GST circular, and an ITR utility change.

In this guide
Answer firstVerified 9 August 2026

The compliance research workflow on Complied AI runs in four steps: open the updates feed to see what changed across MCA, CBDT, CBIC, RBI, and SEBI; open the official document behind the update; jump to the Act or regulation section the change touches; and ask a section-grounded question to confirm how it applies. This moves you from a headline to the source law and a specific answer without leaving the source behind, which is what keeps the research verifiable.

The four-step workflow

Most compliance research starts the same way: something changed, and you need to know what it was and whether it touches you. The workflow on Complied AI is built around that starting point and runs in four steps, each keeping the official source attached so the answer stays traceable.

  1. Open the updates feed to see what changed.
  2. Open the official document behind the update.
  3. Jump to the Act or regulation section the change touches.
  4. Ask a section-grounded question to confirm how it applies.

Step 1: start from the updates feed

The updates feed shows what changed across MCA, CBDT, CBIC and GST, RBI, and SEBI in one place. Filter to the source or type you care about, and scan for the item that prompted your research. Starting here means you are anchored to a real change rather than a half-remembered forward.

The feed is the front door, not the destination. Its job is to get you to the right official document quickly, which is the next step.

Step 2: open the official document

From the update, open the official document behind it: the MCA notification, the CBIC circular, the CBDT notification, whichever regulator issued it. This is where the number, the date, the class covered, and the scope are exact.

Reading the source document is what separates real research from acting on a headline. If a claimed change has no document to open, it is not ready to act on.

Step 3: jump to the Act section

A change means little until you see what it altered in the underlying law. From the document, move to the Act or regulation section it touches and read that section. A rate change points to a charging section; a form change points to a rule; a disclosure change points to a regulation.

Reading the section next to the update surfaces the effective date and the scope that a summary drops, and tells you whether the provision actually reaches your facts.

Step 4: ask a section-grounded question

With the section in front of you, ask a specific question about it. A section-grounded question gets an answer tied to that provision's text, which you can check against the section rather than trust on its own.

This is the step that turns reading into an answer. You are not asking a general question into the void; you are asking about the exact provision the change touched, with the source right there to verify against.

Three worked scenarios

The same four steps apply across regulators. Here is how they play out.

ScenarioHow the four steps run
MCA form changeSpot the form change in the feed, open the MCA notification, read the rule behind the form, ask what the new fields require
GST circularSpot the CBIC circular, open it, read the provision it clarifies, ask how the clarification applies to your supply
ITR utility changeSpot the utility or form change, open the CBDT notice, read the section or rule behind it, ask what the change means for the return

In each case the research ends at a specific answer grounded in a specific section, with the official document one step back. That is the point of the workflow: speed to the source, not away from it.

How to keep it verifiable

  1. Confirm every update against its official document before acting.
  2. Cross-check the source on the regulator's own site, such as MCA, CBIC, or the Income Tax Department.
  3. Read the section text, not only the update headline.
  4. Keep the effective date and scope in your own note against the change.

Where Complied AI fits

The whole workflow is the product. Complied AI puts the updates feed, the official document, the source law, and section-grounded Q&A on one path, so compliance research runs from what changed to the exact provision and a specific answer without ever leaving the source behind. Update, source, section, ask, in one place.

Practical checks

Common questions

What is the basic compliance research workflow on Complied AI?

Start from the updates feed to see what changed, open the official document behind the update, jump to the Act or regulation section that the change touches, and then ask a section-grounded question to confirm how it applies to your case. Each step keeps the official source attached, so the final answer can always be traced back to the law.

Why start from the update rather than the Act?

Because most real compliance questions begin with a change, not with the statute. Something moved, a form, a rate, a timeline, and you need to know what and whether it applies. Starting from the update anchors the research in the actual change, then the section reading tells you what the change altered in the underlying law.

What does section-grounded Q&A mean?

It means the answer is tied to the specific Act or regulation section you are reading, rather than a general response. You ask a question about the provision in front of you and the answer is grounded in that section's text, so you can check it against the source rather than trust it in isolation.

Does this workflow replace professional judgement?

No. The workflow speeds up finding the change, the source, and the relevant section, and helps you frame a question against the text. The professional decision, how the provision applies to a specific set of facts, still rests with the qualified person; the workflow just makes the source material fast to reach and verify.

Publication method

How this guide was prepared

This guide is published by the Complied AI research desk. Its source list and stated position were checked against the official records shown below on 9 August 2026.

Automation, including AI, may assist research, drafting and structure. It does not replace the official record or amount to an independent professional review. Read our editorial standards and corrections policy.

Verification path

Official sources used

Keep reading

Related guides