Circular No. 241/35/2024-GST
F. No. CBIC-20001/14/2024-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
North Block, New Delhi,
Dated the 31^st^ December, 2024
To,
The Principal Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Central Tax (All)
The Principal Directors General/ Directors General (All)
Madam / Sir,
Subject: Clarification on availability of input tax credit as per clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in respect of goods which have been delivered by the supplier at his place of business under Ex-Works Contract-reg.
Reference has been received from automobile sector seeking clarification on availability of input tax credit (hereinafter referred to as “ITC”) as per clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”) in respect of goods which have been delivered by the supplier at his place of business under Ex-Works Contract.
1.2 It has been stated that in automobile sector, the contract between the automobile dealers and the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) is generally an Ex-Works (EXW) contract, and as per the terms of the contract, the property in goods (i.e. vehicles) passes to the dealer at the factory gate of the OEM, when the goods are handed over to the transporter at the instance of the dealer, and the delivery on the part of the OEM is complete at his factory gate. The transport may be arranged by the OEM on behalf of the dealer and where insurance is arranged, it may also be done on behalf of the dealer. Any claim in case of loss has to be lodged by the dealer. The dealer also duly accounts for the invoice in his books of accounts on such delivery of the vehicles at the factory gate of the OEM. The dealer avails ITC on the date the vehicles are billed to him and handed over to the transporter by the OEM at his factory gate. However, some field formations are taking a view that ITC can be availed by the dealer only after the vehicles are physically received by him at his business premises and show cause notices have been issued to a number of dealers, demanding tax for wrongful availment of ITC for contravention of provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of the CGST Act.
2. In order to ensure uniformity in the implementation of the provisions of law across the field formations, the Board, in exercise of its powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 168 of the CGST Act, hereby clarifies the issue as below.
3. Sub-section (2) of section 16 of the CGST Act is a non-obstante clause to section 16 of the CGST Act which enlists the conditions, failing which the registered person is not entitled to ITC in respect of supply of goods or services or both. One of the conditions as per clause (b) of the said sub-section (reproduced below) is that a registered person is not entitled to claim ITC in respect of any supply of goods or services or both unless he has “received” the said goods or services or both. The Explanation to the said clause provides for deemed receipt of goods and services in certain scenarios.
“Section 16. Eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit.
…
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no registered person shall be entitled to the credit of any input tax in respect of any supply of goods or services or both to him unless, -
...
(b) he has received the goods or services or both.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this clause, it shall be deemed that the registered person has received the goods or, as the case may be, services-
(i) where the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise, before or during movement of goods, either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise;
(ii) where the services are provided by the supplier to any person on the direction of and on account of such registered person;
…”
3.1 From a plain reading of the clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of the CGST Act, it is quite apparent that there is no reference of any particular place where goods are required to be “received” by the registered person. This is in contrast to the erstwhile Central Excise regime, where the provisions contemplated physical receipt of the goods at the factory of the manufacturer for taking CENVAT credit on the said goods. In most of the State VAT Acts, the provisions related to credit of the input tax did not have any explicit mention of physical receipt of goods at any particular place and input tax credit was allowed on purchase of goods.
3.2 Explanation to clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of the CGST Act provides that the goods would be deemed to have been “received” by the registered person for the purpose of this clause, where:
- a) the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or to any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise;
- b) such direction may be given before or during movement of goods; and
- c) the goods may be delivered either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise.
3.2.1 The said Explanation provides that where goods are delivered by the supplier to any other person, whether acting as an agent or not, upon the direction of the registered person, and where such delivery occurs either through transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise, the registered person is deemed to have “received” such goods for the purpose of the clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of CGST Act. Accordingly, in cases where goods are delivered by the supplier to the registered person, either directly or to any other person on the directions of the said registered person, the registered person shall be considered to have “received” the said goods for the purpose of clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of CGST Act.
3.3 In the instant case, as per the terms of the EXW contract between the dealer and the OEM:
- a) the goods are being handed over by the OEM to the transporter at his factory gate for onward transmission to the dealer;
- b) transport is arranged by OEM on the behalf of dealer; and
- c) if insurance is arranged, it is done on the behalf of dealer and any claim in case of loss has to be lodged by the dealer.
3.3.1 In such a scenario, the property in the said goods can be considered to have been passed on to the dealer by the OEM upon handing over of the said goods to the transporter at his factory gate, meaning thereby that the goods can be considered to have been delivered to the registered person (the dealer), through the transporter, by the supplier (the OEM) at his factory gate and the supply of the said goods can be considered to have fructified at the factory gate of the OEM, even though the goods may be physically received by the registered person (the dealer) after the transit period. Accordingly, it is clarified that as per Explanation to clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 16 of CGST Act, the registered person (the dealer) can be considered to have “received” the said goods at the time of such handing over of the goods by the supplier to the transporter, at his factory gate, for their onward transmission to the said registered person (the dealer).
