Laws and sections by number or title, due dates, pages, and updates.
The Competition Commission of India approves the proposed combination involving 360 ONE WAM Limited, Mr. Saahil Murarka, and Batlivala & Karani Resources Management Private Limited under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. The transaction includes the acquisition of shares in Batlivala & Karani Securities India Private Limited and Batlivala & Karani Finserv Private Limited, share subscriptions, and the transfer or liquidation of certain subsidiaries. The Commission concludes that the combination does not create an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India because the combined market shares are low and alternative players operate in the markets.
Who is affected
If you do not comply
Ask about this competition order
[Image omitted. See the official document.]
[Image omitted. See the official document.]
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Combination Registration No.C-2025/04/1273
20^th May 2025
Notice under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 filed by 360 ONE WAM Limited, Mr. Saahil Murarka, Batlivala & Karani Resources Management Private Limited
CORAM:
Ms. Ravneet Kaur
Chairperson
Mr. Anil Agrawal
Member
Ms. Sweta Kakkad
Member
Mr. Deepak Anurag
Member
Order under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002
On 15^th April 2025, the Competition Commission of India (Commission) received a notice, under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act), filed by 360 ONE WAM Limited (360 ONE), Mr. Saahil Murarka and Batlivala & Karani Resources Management Private Limited (BKRM) [hereinafter, 360 ONE, Mr. Sahil Murarka and BKRM are collectively referred to as ‘Acquirers’].
The notice has been filed pursuant to execution of the following documents, each dated 27^th January 2025: (i) Share Purchase and Share Subscription Agreement (including its amendment dated 20^th February 2025) (SPSSA), (ii) Share Purchase Agreement (SPA); and (iii) Securities Subscription Agreement (including its subsequent amendment dated 20^th February 2025) (SSA).
The proposed transaction envisages the following:
[The BK Securities Transaction, the BK Securities Consideration Subscription, Third-Party Transfers, Neem Tree Transfer, the Warrant Subscription and the BK Finserv Transaction, are collectively referred to as the ‘Proposed Combination’.]
In accordance with Regulation 14(2) of the Competition Commission of India (Combinations) Regulations, 2024, vide letter dated 29^th April 2025, certain information(s)/ clarification(s) was sought from the Acquirers and response to the same was received on 07^th May 2025.
360 ONE is the ultimate parent entity (UPE) of the 360 ONE group (Acquirer Group/ 360 ONE group) and is listed on the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited. 360 ONE Group is a wealth and asset management firm in India and serves highly specialised and sophisticated needs of high net-worth individuals (HNIs) and ultra-HNIs, affluent families, family offices and institutional clients through tailored wealth management solutions. 360 ONE is present outside India through its wholly owned subsidiaries (WOS) in Canada, Dubai, Mauritius, Singapore and the USA.
Target 1 is in the business of: (i) institutional equity broking; (ii) distribution of (a) mutual funds (MFs), (b) portfolio management services (PMS), (c) alternative investment funds (AIFs), (d) corporate fixed deposits (CFDs), (e) commercial papers (CPs), (f) buying/selling of corporate bonds; (iii) investment banking as a merchant banker; and (iv) research analyst activities. It provides research related services to foreign clients in countries such as the UK, the USA and Hong Kong. Currently, Target 1 has the following subsidiaries: (i) KIPL, (ii) MIAPL, (iii) PPAAPL, (iv) Neem Tree, (v) B&K Securities Pte Limited (BKSPL) and (vi) B&K Securities Limited (BKSL). It is stated that KIPL, MIAPL and PPAAPL are not engaged in the provision of any product/services or in any commercial activity. Further, Neem Tree, with the exception of the insurance broking activities, is also not engaged in any commercial activity. Regarding BKSPL and BKSL, it is submitted that Target 1 shall make an application to relevant governmental authority for liquidation/winding up of BKSPL and BKSL – both of which are foreign subsidiaries of Target 1, as this is a condition precedent to the Proposed Combination and will be undertaken prior to the closing of the Proposed Combination. Target 1 group includes Target 1 and its affiliates as per the Materiality Thresholds[^4].
Target 2 is in the business of distribution of: MFs, PMS, AIFs, CFDs, and CPs. Target 2 only includes Target 2 itself as it has no affiliates as per the Materiality Thresholds. Target 2 holds 20% shareholding in Ayasana Asset AIF LLP. This entity presently does not undertake any business activities; however, it presently holds a Category III AIF License which is in the process of being surrendered.
The Target 1 and 2 belong to the Batlivala & Karani group (Target Group). The Target Group includes Target 1, its affiliates and Target 2. BKRM currently holds 49% shareholding in Target 1 and itself constitutes a part of the Batlivala & Karani group. However, BKRM is merely a holding company and is not engaged in any business / commercial activity. Further, Mr. Saahil Murarka is a natural person and is a strategic financial services professional, currently the Managing Director of Target 1. Apart from the Targets, affiliates of Mr. Saahil Murarka are BK Financial Consultants Private Limited and Maddox Ventures LLP, both of which do not have any business activities. Further, BKRM does not have any affiliates apart from the Targets.
It is submitted in the notice that there are no horizontal overlaps, or existing/potential vertical relationships, or existing/potential complementary linkages between business activities of (i) Mr. Saahil Murarka, BKRM and their affiliates (as per Materiality Thresholds) on one hand, and (ii) 360 ONE and its affiliates (as per Materiality Thresholds) on the other hand. With regard to overlaps assessment of the 360 ONE group with the Targets, it is submitted in the notice that 360 ONE Group is engaged in distribution of MFs in India through 360 ONE Distribution Services Limited (DSL). Further, DSL is also engaged in distribution of PMS, AIF, Corporate Bonds and CFDs along with provision of brokerages and investment banking services. On the other hand, the Targets are also involved in distribution of MFs, PMS, AIFs, Corporate Bonds and CFDs along with provision of brokerage and investment banking services.
Accordingly, it is stated in the notice that the relevant market for the purposes of assessment of horizontal overlaps may be considered as: (i) ‘the market for distribution of MFs in India’ (MF Distribution Market), (ii) ‘the market for distribution of PMS in India’ (PMS Distribution Market), (iii) ‘the market for distribution of AIFs in India’ (AIF Distribution Market), (iv) ‘the market for provision of brokerage services in India’ (Brokerage Market)[^5], (v) ‘the market for provision of investment banking services in India’ (Investment Banking Market), (vi) ‘the market for distribution of corporate bonds in India’ (Corporate Bonds Distribution Market), and (vii) ‘the market for distribution of CFDs in India’ (CFD Distribution Market) [MF Distribution Market, PMS Distribution Market, AIF Distribution Market, Brokerage Market, Investment Banking Market, Corporate Bonds Distribution Market and CFD Distribution Market are collectively referred to as ‘Horizontal Relevant Markets’].
In addition to above, it is submitted that, on one hand, the 360 ONE Group is engaged in the provision of MFs, PMS and AIFs in India and on the other hand, the Targets are engaged in distribution of MFs, PMS and AIFs. Accordingly, the 360 ONE Group and the Targets exhibit existing/potential vertical relationships in the following markets: (i) Vertical Relationship 1 (Potential) between ‘the market for provision of MFs in India’ at the upstream level (Upstream Relevant Market 1) and ‘the market for distribution of MFs in India’ at the downstream level (Downstream Relevant Market 1), (ii) Vertical Relationship 2 (Potential) between ‘the market for provision of PMS in India’ at the upstream level (Upstream Relevant Market 2) and ‘the market for distribution of PMS in India’ at the downstream level (Downstream Relevant Market 2), and (iii) Vertical Relationship 3 (Existing) between ‘the market for provision of AIFs in India’ at the upstream level (Upstream Relevant Market 3) and ‘the market for distribution of AIFs in India’ at the downstream level (Downstream Relevant Market 3) [Upstream Relevant Markets 1-3 and Downstream Relevant Markets 1-3 are collectively referred to as ‘Vertical Relevant Markets’].
The Commission decides to leave precise delineation of the relevant market open, as it is observed that because of the reasons stated below, the Proposed Combination is not likely to result in appreciable adverse effect on competition, irrespective of the manner in which the relevant market is delineated.
Based on the submissions of the Parties, it is noted that the combined market shares of the Acquirers and Target in the Horizontal Relevant Markets are in the range of [0-5] % only, except AIF Distribution Market where the combined market share is in the range of [5-10]% but the incremental market share is negligible. Moreover, there are other players present in the each of the said markets. Accordingly, it appears that the Proposed Combination is not likely to raise competition concern in any of the relevant markets.
Further, it is noted that the individual market shares of the Parties in Vertical Relevant Markets are in the range of [0-5] % only, except Upstream Relevant Market 3 and Downstream Relevant Market 3 where the individual market share of 360 ONE group is in the range of [5-10] %. Moreover, there are other players posing competitive constraints on the Parties in each of these markets. Accordingly, it appears that the Proposed Combination is not likely to raise competition foreclosure concerns in any of the relevant markets identified above.
Considering the material on record, including the details provided in the notice and the assessment of the Combination based on the factors stated in sub-Section (4) of Section 20 of the Act, the Commission is of the opinion that the Combination is not likely to have appreciable adverse effect on competition in India. Therefore, the Commission approves the Proposed Combination under Section 31(1) of the Act.
This order may stand revoked if, at any time, the information provided by the Acquirers is found to be incorrect.
The information provided by the Acquirers shall be treated as confidential in terms of and subject to provisions of Section 57 of the Act.
The Secretary is directed to communicate to the Acquirers accordingly.