By Email/DoT Website Government of India Ministry of Communications Department of Telecommunications Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road, New Delhi - 110 001 (Data Services Cell) No. 813-7/25/2024-DS-II Dated: 23-05-2025 To, All Licensees with Internet Service Authorization Subject: CS(COMM) 937 of 2024: Zee Entertainment…
Official record
Open source pageBy Email/DoT Website Government of India Ministry of Communications Department of Telecommunications Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road, New Delhi - 110 001 (Data Services Cell) No. 813-7/25/2024-DS-II Dated: 23-05-2025 To, All Licensees with Internet Service Authorization Subject: CS(COMM) 937 of 2024: Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited versus Bollyzone.tv & Ors. In the High Court of Delhi. Please find enclosed the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi order dated 24.10.2024 in the captioned suit. 2. Please refer to para para 41(vi, vii & viii) of the said Court order in respect of blocking access to the websites/domains [31 nos.] enumerated in the 19th additional list of websites, received from the plaintiff. 3. In view of the above, all Licensees with Internet Service Authorization are hereby instructed to take immediate necessary action in respect of blocking access to the said websites/domains, as above, in compliance with the said court order. Encl: A/A Director (DS-II) Email: dirds2-dot@nic.in Copy to: i.) Sh. V. Chinnasamy, Scientist E (chinnasamy.v@meity.gov.in), Electronics Niketan, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), New Delhi for kind information and with request to take action as per the enclosed Annexure pl. ii.) Sh. Rishabh Rao (rishabh@saikrishnaassociates.com), Plaintiff's Counsel for kind information and requested to take action as per the enclosed Annexure pl. 813-7/25/2024-DS-II I/3279769/2025 # Domain 1 moviehax.love 2 vegamovie.party 3 movies2watch.app 4 novamovie.net 5 movierulz.my 6 moviesjoy.icu 7 moviehub.pw 8 my-flixerz.to 9 tvids.tv 10 europixhd.stream 11 watchtoday.stream 12 1hd.watch 13 hollymoviehd.cc 14 allmovieland.watch 15 hdtodaytv.tv 16 5movierulz.at 17 m4uhd.nl 18 m4uhd.ws 19 m4uhd.onl 20 yomovies.cash 21 vegamovvies.cc 22 hdmovie2.rehab 23 5movierulz.live 24 123mkv.esq 25 hdmovie2.mn 26 1tamilmv.fi 27 hdmovies23.auction 28 hdmovies4u.la 29 hdhub.gay 19th Additional List 30 vegamovies-nl.uk 31 hdmovie2.giving CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 1 of 27 $~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 937/2024 & I.A. 43185/2024, I.A. 43186/2024, I.A. 43187/2024, I.A. 43188/2024, I.A. 43189/2024 ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Mr. Angad S. Makkar, Mr. Rishabh Rao, and Ms. Chanda Shashikant, Advocates. Mob: 7676612211 Email: rishabh@saikrishnaassociates.com versus BOLLYZONE.TV & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Neel Mason, Advocate with Mr. Vihan Dang, Mr. Ujjawal Bhargava and Mr. Aditya Mathur, Advocates for D-82 Mob: 9399304251 Email: ujjawal.bhargava@mason.co.in CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 24.10.2024 1. The present is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), on behalf of the plaintiff, seeking exemption from I.A. 43188/2024 ((Exemption from filing certified clearer/ typed copies of documents) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 2 of 27 filing certified clearer/typed or translated copies of documents. 2. Exemption is granted, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Plaintiff shall file original, clearer, and translated copies of the documents, on which the plaintiff may seek to place reliance, before the next date of hearing. 4. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of. 5. The present is an application under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Section 151 of CPC, seeking exemption from undergoing Pre-Institution Mediation. I.A. 43189/2024 (Exemption from instituting Pre-Institution Mediation) 6. Having regard to the facts of the present case and in the light of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Yamini Manohar Versus T.K.D. Keerthi, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1382, and Division Bench of this Court in Chandra Kishore Chaurasia Versus RA Perfumery Works Private Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine Del 3529, exemption from attempting Pre-Institution Mediation, is granted. 7. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. 8. The present is an application under Rule 22 of Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022, read with Section 151 CPC, seeking exemption from advance service to defendant nos. 84, 89, 92 and 93. I.A. 43186/2024 (Exemption from advance service to the defendant nos. 84, 89, 92 and 93) 9. The plaintiff seeks urgent interim relief. Therefore, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, exemption from effecting advance service upon the defendant nos. 84, 89, 92 and 93, is granted. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 3 of 27 10. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of. 11. This is an application under Order XI Rule 1(4) read with Section 151 CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, seeking leave to file additional documents. I.A. 43187/2024 (Application seeking leave to file additional documents) 12. The plaintiff, if it wishes to file additional documents at a later stage, shall do so strictly as per the provisions of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018. 13. The application is disposed of, with the aforesaid directions. 14. Let the plaint be registered as suit. CS(COMM) 937/2024 15. Issue summons. 16. Summons is accepted by learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 82. 17. Upon filing of the process fee, issue summons to the other defendants by all permissible modes. Summons shall state that the written statement be filed by the defendants within thirty days from the date of receipt of summons. Along with the written statement, the defendants shall also file affidavit of admission/denial of the plaintiff’s documents, without which, the written statement shall not be taken on record. 18. Liberty is given to the plaintiff to file replication within thirty days from the date of receipt of the written statement. Further, along with the replication, if any, filed by the plaintiff, an affidavit of admission/denial of documents of the defendants, be filed by the plaintiff, without which, the replication shall not be taken on record. If any of the parties wish to seek This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 4 of 27 inspection of the documents, the same shall be sought and given within the timelines. 19. List before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) for marking of exhibits, on 17th 20. List before the Court on 07 December, 2024. th March, 2025. 21. The instant suit is being filed for permanent injunction, rendition of accounts and damages, on account of blatant piracy of the plaintiff’s works and infringement of copyright and broadcast reproduction rights of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, a reputed broadcaster, production house and film studio, owns and operates the Zee Channels and the digital entertainment platform/streaming service called ‘Zee5’ respectively. I.A. 43185/2024 (Under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) 22. It is submitted that the plaintiff has the exclusive distribution rights to publicly exhibit and communicate through any medium or mode, the content on Zee5 and the Zee Channels produced by the plaintiff or exclusively licensed/assigned to the plaintiff (“plaintiff’s works”). The plaintiff’s works are protected as “Cinematograph Films” under Section 2(f) read with Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (“the Act”). The plaintiff has the exclusive right to make the plaintiff’s works available for being seen or heard, or otherwise enjoyed by the public, as enumerated under Section 14(d) of the Act, and further, is also entitled to broadcast reproduction rights in respect of its broadcasts, under Section 37 of the Act. 23. It is submitted that the plaintiff has observed the rampant and large- scale infringement of the plaintiff’s works by the defendant nos. 1 to 60 arrayed in the present suit, which are rogue websites engaged in communicating to the public, hosting, streaming and/or making available to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 5 of 27 the public the plaintiff’s works without authorization, and/or facilitating the same. The plaintiff has come across its original content/television shows/ series, such as Bastar - The Naxal Story, Kakuda, Rautu ka Raaz, Silence 2 - The Night Owl Bar Shootout, Kumkum Bhagya, Bhagya Laxmi, Appi Amchi Collector, Khundali Bhagya, Saatvya Mulichi Saatvi Mulgi, Idhayam, Sunflower, Ayali, Rangbaaz Season 3, Thalamai Seiyalagam, Broken News, Paruvu, Murshid, Karenjit Kaur, and Sitara being hosted and / or streamed on the defendant websites, without any authorisation by the plaintiff. 24. It is submitted that defendant nos. 1 to 60 are essentially, ‘rogue websites’ which are engaged in displaying pirated content in order to obtain certain financial benefits. The defendant websites are anonymous in nature, the owners of which are virtually impossible to locate, as the information provided in the public domain is either, incomplete, incorrect and/or protected behind a veil of secrecy. The defendant websites’ mala fides are evident from the vast volume of third-party content available on its websites; the systematic, organised and intentional nature of the infringement; and also the regularity and consistency with which content is updated/uploaded on the websites, as is evident from the documents filed along with the plaint. Such voluminous evidence of copyright infringement by the said defendants clearly establishes that the defendant websites are ‘rogue’ in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in UTV Software Communications Ltd. & Anr. v. 1337x.to and Ors. (2019 SCC OnLine Del 8002). 25. It is submitted that the defendant nos. 61 to 81 are Domain Name Registrars which have been arrayed for the purpose of blocking access to/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 6 of 27 locking/suspending the defendant websites and to disclose information related to the registrants of the said websites, such as name, address, email address, mobile number, payment details etc. 26. It is submitted that the plaintiff has arrayed Google LLC as defendant no. 82 for the purpose of de-indexing/delisting of the domain names/ websites of such rogue defendant websites from the search results produced on the search engine, ‘Google’, owned/operated by the defendant no. 82. 27. It is submitted that the defendant nos. 83 to 91 are Internet Service Providers which are being arrayed for the limited purpose of blocking/ restricting access to the rogue websites identified in the present suit or any other website subsequently identified by the plaintiff on affidavit. 28. It is submitted that the plaintiff has arrayed defendant no. 92, Department of Telecommunications, and defendant No. 93, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology for the issuance of a notification to the internet and telecom service providers to disable access to the defendant websites identified in the present suit and such other websites subsequently discovered and identified by the plaintiff to be infringing the rights of the plaintiff. The defendant no. 94 is ‘Ashok Kumar’. No formal relief is sought against the defendant nos. 61 to 94. 29. It is submitted that defendant nos. 1-60 are mostly anonymous websites. Details of their owners are either hidden or are forged/inaccurate. These websites are vehicles of infringement and engage in flagrant violation of the intellectual property rights of the plaintiff. Due to the nature of the internet, which offers anonymity, these websites in a systematic manner, engage in violation of the intellectual property rights of the plaintiff. The websites of defendant nos. 1-60 are predominantly engaged in violating third This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 7 of 27 party rights. 30. It is submitted that in view of the aforesaid, the plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking protection of its exclusive rights under the Act. On account of being the producer, exclusive licensee and exclusive assignee having adequate right, and the fact that defendant nos. 1–60 have been violating the rights of the plaintiff, the plaintiff has established a prima facie case in its favour. The plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm and injury if an order of injunction is not passed. The balance of convenience is in favour of the plaintiff on account of it being the rights-owner and having legitimate interest which needs protection. 31. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff has drawn the attention of this Court to the various infringing content which is available on these rogue sites. The list of the defendant websites, and the corresponding pages of the documents filed along with the present plaint, is attached as Annexure-A to the present order. 32. It is submitted that as the plaintiff’s works enjoy protection as a ‘cinematograph films’ under the Act, the making available and/or communication to the public of the plaintiff’s works, without their authorisation, by the defendant websites would amount to a violation of the plaintiff’s exclusive rights under the Act. The balance of convenience is clearly against the defendant websites, which do not have authorisation with respect to the plaintiff’s works, including, inter alia, to host, stream, reproduce, permit download of/distribute, make available to the public and/or communicate the plaintiff’s motion pictures, original content television shows, web-series and other cinematographic works, or facilitate the same. It is submitted that if the illegal activities of the defendant This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 8 of 27 websites are not restrained during the pendency of the present proceedings, plaintiff shall suffer irreparable harm since it is submitted that the defendant websites intend to continue to exploit the plaintiff’s property with impunity, thereby, diminishing and diluting the value of the plaintiff’s rights. 33. Further, it is submitted that this Court in Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited versus Jbomma.Bar and Ors. (CS(COMM) 650/2022), vide order dated 19th September, 2022, had restrained certain rogue websites therein from communicating, hosting, streaming and/or making available for viewing and downloading, without authorization on their websites or other platforms, through the internet in any manner whatsoever, the plaintiff’s works. Further, vide its order 27th February, 2024, inter alia, directed the Domain Name Registrars therein to revoke domain name registrations of such rogue websites and to furnish complete details of such rogue websites. Further, this Court in Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited versus All Rounder Tv and Ors., (CS(COMM) 921/2023), vide its order dated 12th 34. It is submitted that the plaintiff’s entire business depends on the protection of its invaluable intellectual property and in case the same are infringed, the entire business model of the plaintiff will be at great risk and will be adversely affected. The plaintiff has invested huge sums in the production, promotion, distribution and exploitation of the plaintiff’s works. January, 2024, guided by the principles laid down in and in furtherance of the UTV Judgment, restrained third-party mobile applications arrayed as defendants therein from communicating to the public, hosting, storing, reproducing, streaming, broadcasting, re-broadcasting, causing, to be seen or heard by public on payment of charge and/or making available for viewing the plaintiff’s Works through their websites or apps. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 9 of 27 It is submitted that if the infringement thereof is not prevented, it would result in threatening the very future and existence of respective original shows/ television shows/original content since production houses would be unable to raise funds for future works. 35. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 82, i.e., Google, submits that the address of the Google has been incorrectly reflected in the Memo of Parties. 36. Let correct address be provided by learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 82-Google to the plaintiff. 37. Amended memo of parties shall be filed within a period of one week from today. 38. Learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 82 further submits that at this stage no directions be given to defendant no. 82 for de-indexing/de- listing the defendant websites, as the defendant no. 82 being a search engine, any website which is suspended, is not shown as part of the index published in the search engine. 39. He further submits that this may take some time in view of the technological issues. 40. In the above circumstances, the plaintiff has demonstrated a prima facie case for grant of injunction and, in case, no ex parte ad interim injunction is granted, the plaintiff will suffer an irreparable loss. Further, balance of convenience also lies in favour of the plaintiff, and against the defendants. 41. Accordingly, till the next date of hearing, the following directions are issued: I. The defendant nos. 1 to 60, their owners, partners, officers and all This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 10 of 27 others in capacity of principal or agent acting for and on their behalf, or anyone claiming through, by or under it, are restrained from in any manner communicating, hosting, streaming, and/or making available for viewing and downloading, without authorization, on their websites or other platforms, through the internet in any manner whatsoever, the plaintiff’s works so as to infringe the plaintiff’s exclusive rights and broadcast reproduction rights. II. The defendant nos. 61 to 81 and its directors, partners, proprietors, officers, affiliates, servants, employees, and all others in capacity of principal or agent acting for and, on their behalf, or anyone claiming through, by or under it, are directed to suspend the domain name registration of the defendant nos. 1 to 60, as per the details as given in Annexure-B to the present order. III. The defendant nos. 61 to 81, are directed to disclose the following information of defendant nos. 1 to 60: a. Complete details such as name, address, email address, phone number, IP address, etc. b. Mode of payment along with payment details used for registration of domain name by the registrant(s). IV. The defendant nos. 83 to 91, their directors, partners, proprietors, officers, affiliates, servants, employees, and all others in capacity of principal or agent acting for and on their behalf, or anyone claiming through, by or under it, are directed to block access to the various websites identified by the plaintiff, details of which are given as Annexure C. V. The defendant nos. 92 and 93 are directed to issue a notification calling upon the various internet service providers registered under it to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 11 of 27 block access to the various websites identified by the plaintiff in the instant suit, details of which are given as Annexure-C. VI. If during the pendency of the present suit, any further websites are discovered by the plaintiff, which are illegally streaming the infringing content, copyright of which is owned by the plaintiff, the plaintiff is granted liberty to communicate the details of such websites to defendant no. 92 (Department of Telecommunications) and defendant no. 93 (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology), for issuance of blocking orders and simultaneously to the Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) for blocking the said websites. VII. Upon receiving the said intimation from the plaintiff, the ISPs shall take steps to immediately block the rogue websites in question. VIII. The DOT and MEITY shall also issue necessary blocking orders immediately upon the plaintiff, communicating the details of the websites, which are illegally streaming the content, over which the plaintiff has rights. IX. After communication of details of the rogue websites to the concerned authorities, the plaintiff shall continue to file affidavits with the Court, in order to ensure that the Court is fully informed of the websites in respect of which blocking orders are sought. X. If any website, which is not primarily an infringing site, is blocked pursuant to the present order, they shall be permitted to approach this Court by giving an undertaking that it does not intend to engage in any unauthorized streaming of any content, over which the plaintiff has rights. XI. As and when new further websites are discovered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall be at liberty to file an application for their impleadment, which shall be taken up before the Joint Registrar (Judicial), and the order passed This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 12 of 27 today shall be extended to the said newly impleaded website as well. 42. Issue notice to the defendants by all permissible modes, upon filing of process fee, returnable on the next date of hearing. 43. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 82. 44. Let notice be issued to the other defendants. 45. Let reply be filed within a period of four weeks. 46. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within two weeks, thereafter. 47. Compliance of Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC, be done, within a period of one week from today. 48. List before the Court on 7th MINI PUSHKARNA, J OCTOBER 24, 2024 ak March, 2025. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 13 of 27 Annexure-A This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 14 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 15 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 16 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 17 of 27 Annexure-B This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 18 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 19 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 20 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 21 of 27 Annexure-C This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 22 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 23 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 24 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 25 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 26 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 CS(COMM) 937/2024 Page 27 of 27 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 09:59:14 Code 50000.01 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (ORDINARY ORIGINAL COMMERCIAL JURISDICTION) CS (COMM) NO. 937 OF 2024 IN THE MATTER OF: Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. …Plaintiff Versus bollyzone.tv & Ors. …Defendants INDEX S. No. Particulars Pg. No. 1. Amended Memo of Parties reflecting amended address of Defendant No 82, Google LLC 1 - 17 2. Proof of Service Place: New Delhi Vivek Ayyagari (MAH/4861/2016), Date: 25th October 2024 Angad Singh Makkar (D/3579/2021), Rishabh Rao (KAR/3753/2023) Saikrishna & Associates Advocates for the Plaintiff 57, Jor Bagh, New Delhi +91 9897896284 angad@saikrishnaassociates.com Code 50000.01 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (ORDINARY ORIGINAL COMMERCIAL JURISDICTION) CS (COMM) NO. 937 OF 2024 IN THE MATTER OF: Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited 18th Floor, A Wing, Marathon Futurex, N.M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400 013 Email: Girish.kaul@zee.com Mobile No.: 09711133934 Also at: FC-19, Sector 16-A, Noida - 201301 … Plaintiff Versus 1) bollyzone.tv Email: abuse@namecheap.com 2) hdmovie2.farm Also at: hdmoviehub.directory Email: hdmoviehubforall@gmail.com 3) hdhub4u.observer Email: domainabuse@tucows.com 1 4) bollyflix.beer Email: bollyflix@protonmail.com Also at: bollyflix.hair Email: abuse@namecheap.com bollymod.tech Email: abuse@hostinger.com topmovies.mov Email: domainabuse@tucows.com bollyflix.li 5) ssrmovies.contact Email: abuse@namesilo.com 6) filmyzilla.com.sl Email: abuse@101domain.com Also at: gigerfilm.com Email: support@hostingconcept.net 7) movies4u.sydney Email: abuse@namecheap.com 8) 7starhd.clinic Email: abuse@namecheap.com Also at: 7starhd.click Email: abuse@spaceship.com 7starhd.vote Email: abuse@godaddy.com 9) banglaplex.art Email: abuse@hostinger.com 2 10) full4movies.forum Email: abuse@namecheap.com 11) mkvcinemas.cat Email: domainabuse@tucows.com 12) 1cinevood.pics Email: abuse@namecheap.com 13) skymovieshd.surf Email: abuse@dynadot.com Also at: skymovieshd.chat Email: abuse@namecheap.com 14) vegamovies4u.com.in Email: contact@vegamovies.com.in Also, at: vegamovies.beer Email: abuse@key-systems.net vegamovies3.com.co Email: abuse@namecheap.com 15) downloadhub.mov Email: abuse@namecheap.com 16) 1tamilblasters.dad Email: domainabuse@tucows.com 17) prmovies.day Also at: uwatchfree.hair Email: abuse@namecheap.com 3 18) dotmovies.beer Email: abuse@key-systems.net Also at: dotmovies.fashion Email: abuse@spaceship.com 19) 7hitmovies.zip Email: abuse@namecheap.com Also at: 10hitmovies.com Email: abuse@dynadot.com 9xmovies.dating Email: abuse@namecheap.com m.9xflix.fashion Email: myteam0006@gmail.com 20) hdking.fit Email: abuse@namecheap.com 21) filmyfly.contact Email: admin@Filmyfly.net Also at: filmyhit.gold Email: abuse@namecheap.com filmywap.pm Email: terve@sarek.fi 22) desiremovies.cymru Email: domainabuse@tucows.com Also at: desiremovies.cam Email: abuse@namecheap.com 4 desiremovies.icu Email: abuse@namecheap.com 23) movierulz.dev Email: abuse@namesilo.com Also at: movierulzfree.blog Email: abuse@dynadot.com 5movierulz.cx Email: registry@key-systems.net movierulz.nl Email: abuse@namecheap.com 7movierulz.so Email: abuse@key-systems.net 5movierulz.mom Email: abuse@nicenic.net watchmovierulz.re Email: terve@sarek.fi ww6.4movierulz.to 5movierulz.limo Email: abuse@namesilo.com 24) thenextplanet.me Email: TheNextPlanet@protonmail.com 25) extramovies.foo Email: abuse@namecheap.com 26) 1tamilmv.tf Email: abuse@name.com 27) luxmovies.shop 5 Email: moviescontact@protonmail.com Also at luxmovies.co.in Email: abuse@publicdomainregistry.com 28) todaypk.llc Email: abuse@namesilo.com 29) ibomma.icu Email: abuse@dynadot.com Also at: ibommamovies.shop Email: abuse@namecheap.com 30) undekhaserial.com Email: abuse@namecheap.com 31) khatrimaza.me.in Email: abuse@dynadot.com Also at: khatrimaza.forum, khatrimazaful.cyou Email: abuse@namecheap.com 32) apnetv.to Also at: serialbaba.to apnetv.uk apnetv.io Email: abuse@namecheap.com 33) 1337x.to Also at: 1337xhd.vip Email: abuse@dynadot.com 6 1337x.proxyninja.org Email: domainabuse@tucows.com 34) filmyhunk.com.ro Also at: filmyhunk.club Email: abuse@spaceship.com 35) gillitv.live Email: abuse@godaddy.com 36) ofilmywap.org.vc Email: abuse@dynadot.com Also at 3filmywap.com Email: abuse@spaceship.com 37) ww1.pogolinks.digital Email: abuse@namecheap.com 38) parineetiserial.net Email: abuse@namecheap.com 39) dekhodramatv.live Email: abuse@dynadot.com 40) desitellybox.me Email: abuse@spaceship.com 41) yodesitv.info Email: abuse@namecheap.com Also at: yodesiserials.su Email: support@ardis.ru yodesiserials.net 7 Email: abuse@dynadot.com 42) desirulez.co Email: abuse@namecheap.com 43) 0gomovies.cam Email: abuse@namecheap.com Also at: ww2.0gomovies.com.pk 44) oldserials.co Email: abuse@namecheap.com 45) nowmelive.com Email: abuse@enom.com 46) movieplex.my Email: abuse@namecheap.com 47) apnaalo.net Email: abuse@dynadot.com 48) wwv.dhruvtara.su Email: support@ardis.ru 49) ziddidil.asia Email: abuse@dynadot.com 50) gogoserials.net Email: abuse@dynadot.com Also at: wwv.gogodramas.su Email: id@nic.ru ; sales@register.su 51) madamsir.net 8 Email: abuse@porkbun.com 52) udariyaanserial.net Email: abuse@namecheap.com 53) anupama.blog Email: abuse@enom.com 54) wwu.herogayab.me/apnetv4 Email: abuse@dynadot.com 55) ghumhaipyarmein.com Email: domain-abuse@dreamhost.com 56) afilmyhit.firm.in Email: abuse@dynadot.com 57) cinevez.shop Email: abuse@dynadot.com 58) worldfree4u.pm Email: terve@sarek.fi 59) bolly2tolly.art Email: abuse@porkbun.com 60) bdmusicboss.shop Email: abuse@dynadot.com 61) Godaddy.com, LLC Email: grievanceofficer@godaddy.com 4th Floor, Statesman House, Barakhamba Road Connaught Place, New Delhi, Central Delhi, Delhi. 9 Also at: 14455 North Hayden Road, Suite 219 Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, United States 62) Namecheap LLC Email: support@namecheap.com ; grievance.officer@namecheap.com 4600 East Washington Street Suite 300, Phoenix, Arizona 85034, US 63) Porkbun LLC 21370 SW Langer Farms Parkway, Suite-142-429 Sherwood, OR 97140, US Email: support@porkbun.com; abusegrievance-officer- in@porkbun.com 64) Spaceship, Inc. 4600 East Washington Street, Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ 85034, USA Email: support@spaceship.com 65) Sarek Oy Email: terve@sarek.fi Urho Kekkosen Katu 4-6 E, 00100 Helsinki, Finland 66) Hostinger Email: support@hostinger.com Hostinger, UAB. Jonavos str. 60C, 44192 67) Namesilo LLP Email: internaldomains@namesilo.com 10 1300 E. Missouri Avenue Suite A-110 68) Active- SU Email: id@nic.ru ; sales@register.su 2/1, 3d Khoroshevskaya str., Moscow, 123308, Russian Federation 69) Tucows Inc. 96 Mowat Avenue Toronto, ON M6K 3M1 Canada Email: info@tucows.com; compliance@tucows.com 70) Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu, Kipstraat 3c-5c Rotterdam 3 011 RR Netherlands + 31 104482296 Email: support@openprovider.com, support@hostingconcept.net 71) Endurance Digital Domain Technology Private Limited HD 016 WeEork Bldg 4 Nesc, Western Exp Highway, Goregaon East, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400063 Email: deepak.dalwani@newfold.com 72) 101domain GRS Limited, Level 2, Plaza 3 Custom House Plaza Harbourmaster Place, Dublin D01 VY76, Ireland Email: abuse@101domain.com 73) Dynadot Inc. 11 210 S Ellsworth Ave #345 San Mateo, CA 94401 USA Email: info@dynadot.com, abuse@dynodot.com; nixi.grievance.officer@dynadot.com 74) Key-Systems GmbH Kaiserstraße 172-174 66386 St. Ingbert E-Mail: abuse@key-systems.net, complaints@keysystems.net 75) CentralNic Ltd. 4th Floor, Saddlers House, 44 Gutter Lane, London, EC2V 6BR Email: info@centralnic.com, abuse@centralnic.com 76) Nicenic International Group Company Limited NiceNIC.NET, Room 1704, Hang Lung Center Paterson Street, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong. Email: email@nicenic.net 77) Name.com, Inc. 414 14th Street #200 Denver, Colorado 80202 Email: abuse@name.com 78) Netim 264 Avenue, Arthur Notebart, 59160, Lille, France 12 Email: grievance-officier@netim.net 79) LLC "Ardis" 236010, Kaliningrad, Tenistaya Alley Str., 18, Russia Email: support@ardis.ru 80) Enom LLC 10400 NE 4th Street Floor 5, Suite 121 Bellevue, WA 98004 USA Email: legal@enom.com, abuse@enom.com 81) DreamHost LLC PMB #257 417, Associated Rd. Brea, CA 92821 USA Email: abuse@dreamhost.com 82) Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California, 94043, United States of America. 83) Atria Convergence Technologies Private Limited 99A/113A, Manorayana Palya R.T. Nagar Bangalore – 560032 Also at: 2nd and 3rd Floor, No. 1, Indian Express Building, Queen’s Road, Bangalore – 560001, Karnataka 13 Email: nodal.term@actcorp.in; nodalofficer.ncr@actcorp.in, jitesh.chathambil@actcorp.in 84) Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. 5th Floor, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Sadan 9, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road New Delhi – 110003 E-mail: raco.mtnl@gmail.com; mtnlcsco@gmail.com; gmracomtnl@gmail.com 85) Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited RCP 14 (TC 23), Phase 4, B-Block, 3rd Floor, C 4 130 Twane- belapur Road, Gansoli, Navi Mumbai- 400701 E-mail: care@jio.com; Hitesh.marthak@relianceada.com; Kapoor.guliani@ril.com; mahipal.singh@ril.com; sunil.kr.gupta@ril.com; shilpi.kant@ril.com; jyoti.jain@ril.com; rudraksha.sinha@ril.com; neelakantan.an@ril.com 86) Shyam Spectra Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 258, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi – 110020 Also at: Plot No. 21-22, 3rd Floor, Udyog Vihar, Phase IV, Gurugram -122015 E-mail: info@spectra.co; compliance@spectra.co 14 87) Tata Teleservices Ltd. A, E & F Blocks Voltas Premises - T. B. Kadam Marg Chinchpokli, Mumbai – 400033 E-mail: pravin.jogani@tatatel.co.in; anand.dalal@tatatel.co.in; satya.yadav@tatatel.co.in 88) Vodafone Idea Limited Vodafone House, Peninsula Corporate Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400 013 India Also at: Birla Centurion, 10th Floor, Plot no.794, B Wing, Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli, Mumbai - 400 030 India E-mail: smitha.menon@vodafoneidea.com; pankaj.kapdeo@vodafoneidea.com Radhika.gokhale@vodafoneidea.com sheena.thukral@vodafoneidea.com; lavati.sairam@vodafoneidea.com 89) Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd Bharat Sanchar Bhawan, Regulation Cell 5th floor, Harish Chandra Mathur Lane Janpath, New Delhi -110001 E-mail: ddg_reg@bsnl.co.in; sbkhare@bsnl.co.in; averma@bsnl.co.in; sushmamishra71@gmail.com 15 90) Bharti Airtel Ltd. Airtel Centre, Tower-A, 6th Floor ‘A’Wing, Plot No.16, Udyog Vihar Ph - IV, Gurgaon – 122016 E-mail: amit.bhatia@airtel.com 91) Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Ltd. ‘Rahejas',4 floor, Main Avenue Santacruz (W), Mumbai-40054 E-mail: ajay.singh@hathway.net; dulal@hathway.net; sudhir.shetye@hathway.net 92) Department of Telecommunications Through Secretary, Ministry of Communications and IT, 20, Sanchar Bhawan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi – 110001 E-mail: secy-dot@nic.in, dirds2-dot@nic.in 93) Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology Through the Director General (DIT) Cyber Laws & e- security), Electronics Niketan, 6, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi – 110003 E-mail: cyberlaw-legal@meity.gov.in; gccyberlaw@meity.gov.in; pkumar@meity.gov.in, sathya.s@meity.gov.in 94) Ashok Kumar … Defendants 16 Place: New Delhi Vivek Ayyagari (MAH/4861/2016), Date: 25th October 2024 Angad Singh Makkar (D/3579/2021), Rishabh Rao (KAR/3753/2023) Saikrishna & Associates Advocates for the Plaintiff 57, Jor Bagh, New Delhi +91 9897896284 angad@saikrishnaassociates.com Note: Defendant No. 1 along with Defendant Nos. 2 – 60 are the main contesting Defendants. 17 Annexure Subject: Action requested to be taken by MEITY and Plantiff for effective removal of content for viewing by public at large within India as per the said orders of Hon’ble Court. It is observed that a number of orders of Hon’ble Court are issued for blocking of websites every month. There are around more than 2700 ISPs in India and these ISPs are connected among themselves in a mesh network. DOT is instructing each of the ISPs through emails/through its website for blocking of the websites as ordered by the Hon’ble Courts. Ensuring compliance of the orders by each of the ISPs is a time-consuming and complex task especially in view of multiplicity of orders of Hon’ble Courts, multiplicity of websites to be blocked and multiplicity of ISPs. 2. Allocation of Business Rules inter-alia sates thus:- ‘Policy matters relating to information technology; Electronics; and Internet (all matters other than licensing of Internet Service Provider)’. 3. In view of above and in order to ensure effective removal by content for viewing by public at large, the plantiff is requested to do a trace route of the web server hosting the said website. In case the web server happens to be in India, the plantiff may inform the same to Meity who may direct the owner of such web server to stop transmission of content as per IT Act and as directed by the Hon’ble Court so that the content would be blocked from the source itself and the exercise of blocking by 2700 ISPs would not be required. 4. In case such server is located abroad i.e. outside India then access to such URL/website can be blocked through the international internet gateways which are much less in number. This would result in timely and effectively removal of undesirable content for viewing by public at large as is the requirement as per the orders of Hon’ble Court.
Research the source law
This record is not yet linked to a specific provision. Browse the law library, choose the affected provision and ask against the exact statutory text.
Browse source laws